Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol ; 2004 Jun-Sep; 22(2-3): 115-21
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-37241

ABSTRACT

Recently, cockroaches have been established as the second most Important allergen, producing allergic diseases, especially in low socioeconomic populations. In Thailand, about 44-61% of atopic patients were positive to cockroach extract by a skin-prick test. This study examined cockroach allergen levels in relation to cockroach species and allergic diseases in the houses of cockroach-sensitive patients. Sixty households of allergic patients in the Bangkok metropolitan area were surveyed using open- and closed-ended questionnaires. Cockroaches were collected using commercial cockroach traps, while dust samples were obtained from the bedrooms, kitchens and living rooms of the houses using a vacuum cleaner. The cockroaches were counted and their species Identified. The levels of cockroach allergens were determined by specific monoclonal antibodies using a monoclonal antibody-polyclonal antibody based sandwich ELISA kit. Six cockroach species were Identified: Periplaneta americana (American cockroach, 72.15%), Supella longlpalpa (2.75%, found in only one house), Periplaneta brunnea (0.78%), Periplaneta australaslae (0.78%), Neostylopyga rhombifolla (0.78%), Blattella germanica (German cockroach, 0.39%) and nymphs (22.35%). Allergens of the predominant species, P. americana, were detectable in all homes studied, with the highest levels in the kitchen areas. The range of allergen levels in house dust varied from 0.40-162.00 microg per g of dust. The median and mean allergen levels in kitchen dust were 59.16 microg and 62.80 microg per g of dust, respectively, while the median allergen level in bedroom dust was only 15.90 microg per g of dust. The German cockroach allergen (Bla g 2) was undetectable in any of the houses. IN CONCLUSION: P. americana was the most common cockroach and may be the species causing allergic diseases, especially asthma, in Thailand, which differs from the USA and Europe


Subject(s)
Allergens/analysis , Animals , Cockroaches/classification , Dust/immunology , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Humans , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Insect Proteins/analysis , Thailand
2.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health ; 2004 Sep; 35(3): 705-10
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-32316

ABSTRACT

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional bowel disorder in which abdominal pain is associated with a defect or a change in bowel habits. Subtle inflammation, especially after infectious enteritis, has been sometimes suspected as one mechanism of pathogenesis. This research was performed (1) to evaluate the prevalence of parasitic infections and (2) the possible association of IBS and parasitic infections. Fifty-nine IBS patients were recruited using symptom-based criteria (Rome Criteria II) with an absence of intestinal parasitic infection by direct smear method. Stool samples of individual patients were examined using 7 methods, ie examination for stool occult blood, simple saline smear method, formalin-ether technique, culture for Blastocystis hominis, modified trichrome stain, modified Ziehl-Neelsen method, and trichrome stain for parasitic and bacterial infections. Of the 59 patients, stool samples of 13 patients (22.1%) were positive for parasites. These were B. hominis (13.6%), Strongyloides stercoralis larvae (1.7%), Giardia lamblia cysts (1.7%), and non-pathogenic protozoa, ie Endolimax nana cysts (5.1%). The prevalence rate of parasitic infections in the control group (20%) was not statistically different from the patients. There was no statistical difference between B. hominis infection in IBS patients and control was found in this study (p = 0.87). In the IBS group, B. hominis infection predominated (13.6%), while other parasitic infections were found in 8.5%. The culture method for B. hominis is more sensitive than the direct (simple) stool smear method, which is the routine diagnostic method in most laboratories. These results were also found in control group.


Subject(s)
Animals , Blastocystis Infections/diagnosis , Blastocystis hominis/isolation & purification , Case-Control Studies , Endolimax/isolation & purification , Feces/parasitology , Female , Giardia lamblia/isolation & purification , Humans , Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic/epidemiology , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/epidemiology , Male , Prevalence , Strongyloides stercoralis/isolation & purification , Thailand/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL